![]() ![]() If you are after quality and accuracy, using a professional human transcriptionist is your best option. Human transcription versus voice recognition software Voice recognition software provides a faster transcription, and the cost of the service is much cheaper than transcriptions produced by humans. In some instances, the errors can be due to limitations in the software dictionary. Large artificial intelligence (AI) companies such as Microsoft, IBM, Amazon, and Google, as well as independent ones, are improving automatic captioning software to make recorded materials accessible to more people.Ĭurrently, real-time captioning is about 90% accurate, although viewers may still see errors in the captions due to misunderstood or misheard words. Let us compare the two so you can make the right decision on which type you want to use for your next transcription project.Īlthough most of the voice recognition software today is much better than that available a few years back, there are still issues with accuracy, quality, and the time spent in the transcribing process. Furthermore, it is a lot cheaper than human transcription. Many clients ask about voice recognition because it is becoming quite popular. ![]() There is no doubt that human transcription provides the highest level of accuracy, but developers of voice recognition software continue to improve its features using the advancements in technology. Transcription service providers either use human transcriptionists or voice recognition software. Many multimedia content producers need transcription services to provide captions for their video materials. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |